Go Back
Choose this branch
You can't go any further
meritocratic
regular
democratic
hot
top
alive
51 posts
Population ethics
Repugnant conclusion
Person-affecting views
Total view
4 posts
Ethics of existential risk
73
Minimalist extended very repugnant conclusions are the least repugnant
Teo Ajantaival
1mo
0
9
Talk - 'Caring for the Far Future'
Yadav
11d
0
26
My (Lazy) Longtermism FAQ
Devin Kalish
1mo
6
52
The Repugnant Conclusion Isn't
AppliedDivinityStudies
3mo
24
61
Confused about "making people happy" vs. "making happy people"
tobiasleenaert
5mo
46
12
Jane English on Rawls and duties to future generations
William D'Alessandro
1mo
3
18
Confidence in the premises of the Repugnant Conclusion - results from a small survey
Vasco Grilo
2mo
2
59
What We Owe the Past
Austin
7mo
19
20
What is your confidence in the premises of the Repugnant Conclusion?
Vasco Grilo
3mo
8
27
The repugnant conclusion is not a problem for the total view
Luca Stocco
4mo
11
35
Transcript of a talk on The non-identity problem by Derek Parfit at EAGxOxford 2016
james
6mo
4
140
Avoiding the Repugnant Conclusion is not necessary for population ethics: new many-author collaboration.
deanspears
1y
16
20
The standard person-affecting view doesn't solve the Repugnant Conclusion.
RedStateBlueState
3mo
6
103
Shelly Kagan - readings for Ethics and the Future seminar (spring 2021)
james
1y
7
197
Critique of MacAskill’s “Is It Good to Make Happy People?”
Magnus Vinding
3mo
114
209
Prioritizing x-risks may require caring about future people
elifland
4mo
39
73
Linkpost for various recent essays on suffering-focused ethics, priorities, and more
Magnus Vinding
2mo
0
72
The person-affecting value of existential risk reduction
Gregory Lewis
4y
35