Go Back
Choose this branch
Choose this branch
meritocratic
regular
democratic
hot
top
alive
40 posts
Population ethics
Person-affecting views
11 posts
Repugnant conclusion
Total view
140
Avoiding the Repugnant Conclusion is not necessary for population ethics: new many-author collaboration.
deanspears
1y
16
103
Shelly Kagan - readings for Ethics and the Future seminar (spring 2021)
james
1y
7
97
Against neutrality about creating happy lives
Joe_Carlsmith
1y
38
70
A longtermist critique of “The expected value of extinction risk reduction is positive”
antimonyanthony
1y
10
62
Why do you find the Repugnant Conclusion repugnant?
Will Bradshaw
1y
63
61
Confused about "making people happy" vs. "making happy people"
tobiasleenaert
5mo
46
59
What We Owe the Past
Austin
7mo
19
55
Critical summary of Meacham’s "Person-Affecting Views and Saturating Counterpart Relations"
Ardenlk
1y
31
51
Descriptive Population Ethics and Its Relevance for Cause Prioritization
David_Althaus
4y
9
41
The Impossibility of a Satisfactory Population Prospect Axiology
EJT
1y
12
41
The problem with person-affecting views
Jack Malde
2y
22
39
Teruji Thomas, 'The Asymmetry, Uncertainty, and the Long Term'
Pablo
3y
6
38
Are You Sure You Want To Donate To The Against Malaria Foundation?
MichaelPlant
6y
48
35
Transcript of a talk on The non-identity problem by Derek Parfit at EAGxOxford 2016
james
6mo
4
73
Minimalist extended very repugnant conclusions are the least repugnant
Teo Ajantaival
1mo
0
72
Spears & Budolfson, 'Repugnant conclusions'
Pablo
1y
15
52
The Repugnant Conclusion Isn't
AppliedDivinityStudies
3mo
24
29
GiveWell's Charity Recommendations Require Taking a Controversial Stance on Population Ethics
MichaelDickens
6y
53
27
The repugnant conclusion is not a problem for the total view
Luca Stocco
4mo
11
20
What is your confidence in the premises of the Repugnant Conclusion?
Vasco Grilo
3mo
8
18
Confidence in the premises of the Repugnant Conclusion - results from a small survey
Vasco Grilo
2mo
2
2
Does Effective Altruism Lead to the Altruistic Repugnant Conclusion?
RandomEA
5y
14
1
Reducing existential risks or wild animal suffering?
4y
25
1
Is the reasoning of the Repugnant Conclusion valid?
Adithya
8mo
16
0
If you could 2x the number of future humans by reducing the QALYs per person by half, would you choose to do it? Why or why not?
Parmest Roy
2mo
0