Go Back
Choose this branch
You can't go any further
meritocratic
regular
democratic
hot
top
alive
51 posts
Population ethics
Repugnant conclusion
Person-affecting views
Total view
4 posts
Ethics of existential risk
71
Confused about "making people happy" vs. "making happy people"
tobiasleenaert
5mo
46
-4
Will longtermists self-efface
Noah Scales
4mo
23
36
The Repugnant Conclusion Isn't
AppliedDivinityStudies
3mo
24
30
My (Lazy) Longtermism FAQ
Devin Kalish
1mo
6
9
A critique of strong longtermism
Pablo Rosado
3mo
11
12
What is your confidence in the premises of the Repugnant Conclusion?
Vasco Grilo
3mo
8
35
The repugnant conclusion is not a problem for the total view
Luca Stocco
4mo
11
12
Jane English on Rawls and duties to future generations
William D'Alessandro
1mo
3
42
Are You Sure You Want To Donate To The Against Malaria Foundation?
MichaelPlant
6y
48
12
The standard person-affecting view doesn't solve the Repugnant Conclusion.
RedStateBlueState
3mo
6
4
Population Ethics Meets Genetic Enhancement
Parrhesia
2mo
4
20
Confidence in the premises of the Repugnant Conclusion - results from a small survey
Vasco Grilo
2mo
2
11
Beware ethical systems without repugnant conclusions
Ezra Newman
4mo
2
1
Weighted wellbeing population theory
brb243
1y
2
141
Prioritizing x-risks may require caring about future people
elifland
4mo
39
229
Critique of MacAskill’s “Is It Good to Make Happy People?”
Magnus Vinding
3mo
114
97
Linkpost for various recent essays on suffering-focused ethics, priorities, and more
Magnus Vinding
2mo
0
56
The person-affecting value of existential risk reduction
Gregory Lewis
4y
35