Go Back
Choose this branch
You can't go any further
meritocratic
regular
democratic
hot
top
alive
51 posts
Population ethics
Repugnant conclusion
Person-affecting views
Total view
4 posts
Ethics of existential risk
142
A longtermist critique of “The expected value of extinction risk reduction is positive”
antimonyanthony
1y
10
88
Avoiding the Repugnant Conclusion is not necessary for population ethics: new many-author collaboration.
deanspears
1y
16
85
Against neutrality about creating happy lives
Joe_Carlsmith
1y
38
79
Minimalist extended very repugnant conclusions are the least repugnant
Teo Ajantaival
1mo
0
79
Shelly Kagan - readings for Ethics and the Future seminar (spring 2021)
james
1y
7
71
Confused about "making people happy" vs. "making happy people"
tobiasleenaert
5mo
46
57
Descriptive Population Ethics and Its Relevance for Cause Prioritization
David_Althaus
4y
9
54
Why do you find the Repugnant Conclusion repugnant?
Will Bradshaw
1y
63
53
What We Owe the Past
Austin
7mo
19
48
Spears & Budolfson, 'Repugnant conclusions'
Pablo
1y
15
47
Critical summary of Meacham’s "Person-Affecting Views and Saturating Counterpart Relations"
Ardenlk
1y
31
47
Teruji Thomas, 'The Asymmetry, Uncertainty, and the Long Term'
Pablo
3y
6
46
Defending the Procreation Asymmetry with Conditional Interests
MichaelStJules
3y
13
42
Are You Sure You Want To Donate To The Against Malaria Foundation?
MichaelPlant
6y
48
229
Critique of MacAskill’s “Is It Good to Make Happy People?”
Magnus Vinding
3mo
114
141
Prioritizing x-risks may require caring about future people
elifland
4mo
39
97
Linkpost for various recent essays on suffering-focused ethics, priorities, and more
Magnus Vinding
2mo
0
56
The person-affecting value of existential risk reduction
Gregory Lewis
4y
35