Go Back
Choose this branch
You can't go any further
meritocratic
regular
democratic
hot
top
alive
51 posts
Population ethics
Repugnant conclusion
Person-affecting views
Total view
4 posts
Ethics of existential risk
114
Avoiding the Repugnant Conclusion is not necessary for population ethics: new many-author collaboration.
deanspears
1y
16
106
A longtermist critique of “The expected value of extinction risk reduction is positive”
antimonyanthony
1y
10
91
Against neutrality about creating happy lives
Joe_Carlsmith
1y
38
91
Shelly Kagan - readings for Ethics and the Future seminar (spring 2021)
james
1y
7
76
Minimalist extended very repugnant conclusions are the least repugnant
Teo Ajantaival
1mo
0
66
Confused about "making people happy" vs. "making happy people"
tobiasleenaert
5mo
46
60
Spears & Budolfson, 'Repugnant conclusions'
Pablo
1y
15
58
Why do you find the Repugnant Conclusion repugnant?
Will Bradshaw
1y
63
56
What We Owe the Past
Austin
7mo
19
54
Descriptive Population Ethics and Its Relevance for Cause Prioritization
David_Althaus
4y
9
51
Critical summary of Meacham’s "Person-Affecting Views and Saturating Counterpart Relations"
Ardenlk
1y
31
44
The Repugnant Conclusion Isn't
AppliedDivinityStudies
3mo
24
43
Teruji Thomas, 'The Asymmetry, Uncertainty, and the Long Term'
Pablo
3y
6
40
Are You Sure You Want To Donate To The Against Malaria Foundation?
MichaelPlant
6y
48
213
Critique of MacAskill’s “Is It Good to Make Happy People?”
Magnus Vinding
3mo
114
175
Prioritizing x-risks may require caring about future people
elifland
4mo
39
85
Linkpost for various recent essays on suffering-focused ethics, priorities, and more
Magnus Vinding
2mo
0
64
The person-affecting value of existential risk reduction
Gregory Lewis
4y
35