Go Back
Choose this branch
You can't go any further
meritocratic
regular
democratic
hot
top
alive
35 posts
Population ethics
Person-affecting views
5 posts
9
Talk - 'Caring for the Far Future'
Yadav
11d
0
26
My (Lazy) Longtermism FAQ
Devin Kalish
1mo
6
59
What We Owe the Past
Austin
7mo
19
35
Transcript of a talk on The non-identity problem by Derek Parfit at EAGxOxford 2016
james
6mo
4
140
Avoiding the Repugnant Conclusion is not necessary for population ethics: new many-author collaboration.
deanspears
1y
16
103
Shelly Kagan - readings for Ethics and the Future seminar (spring 2021)
james
1y
7
62
Why do you find the Repugnant Conclusion repugnant?
Will Bradshaw
1y
63
97
Against neutrality about creating happy lives
Joe_Carlsmith
1y
38
70
A longtermist critique of “The expected value of extinction risk reduction is positive”
antimonyanthony
1y
10
13
Beware ethical systems without repugnant conclusions
Ezra Newman
4mo
2
55
Critical summary of Meacham’s "Person-Affecting Views and Saturating Counterpart Relations"
Ardenlk
1y
31
41
The Impossibility of a Satisfactory Population Prospect Axiology
EJT
1y
12
5
A critique of strong longtermism
Pablo Rosado
3mo
11
41
The problem with person-affecting views
Jack Malde
2y
22
61
Confused about "making people happy" vs. "making happy people"
tobiasleenaert
5mo
46
12
Jane English on Rawls and duties to future generations
William D'Alessandro
1mo
3
20
The standard person-affecting view doesn't solve the Repugnant Conclusion.
RedStateBlueState
3mo
6
2
Will longtermists self-efface
Noah Scales
4mo
23
5
The problem of possible populations: animal farming, sustainability, extinction and the repugnant conclusion
Stijn
1y
9