Go Back
Choose this branch
You can't go any further
meritocratic
regular
democratic
hot
top
alive
35 posts
Population ethics
Person-affecting views
5 posts
13
Talk - 'Caring for the Far Future'
Yadav
11d
0
28
My (Lazy) Longtermism FAQ
Devin Kalish
1mo
6
56
What We Owe the Past
Austin
7mo
19
29
Transcript of a talk on The non-identity problem by Derek Parfit at EAGxOxford 2016
james
6mo
4
106
A longtermist critique of “The expected value of extinction risk reduction is positive”
antimonyanthony
1y
10
114
Avoiding the Repugnant Conclusion is not necessary for population ethics: new many-author collaboration.
deanspears
1y
16
12
Beware ethical systems without repugnant conclusions
Ezra Newman
4mo
2
91
Shelly Kagan - readings for Ethics and the Future seminar (spring 2021)
james
1y
7
58
Why do you find the Repugnant Conclusion repugnant?
Will Bradshaw
1y
63
7
A critique of strong longtermism
Pablo Rosado
3mo
11
91
Against neutrality about creating happy lives
Joe_Carlsmith
1y
38
36
The Impossibility of a Satisfactory Population Prospect Axiology
EJT
1y
12
51
Critical summary of Meacham’s "Person-Affecting Views and Saturating Counterpart Relations"
Ardenlk
1y
31
12
Narration: "Against neutrality about creating happy lives"
D0TheMath
1y
1
12
Jane English on Rawls and duties to future generations
William D'Alessandro
1mo
3
66
Confused about "making people happy" vs. "making happy people"
tobiasleenaert
5mo
46
16
The standard person-affecting view doesn't solve the Repugnant Conclusion.
RedStateBlueState
3mo
6
-1
Will longtermists self-efface
Noah Scales
4mo
23
7
The problem of possible populations: animal farming, sustainability, extinction and the repugnant conclusion
Stijn
1y
9