Go Back
Choose this branch
You can't go any further
meritocratic
regular
democratic
hot
top
alive
35 posts
Population ethics
Person-affecting views
5 posts
17
Talk - 'Caring for the Far Future'
Yadav
11d
0
30
My (Lazy) Longtermism FAQ
Devin Kalish
1mo
6
142
A longtermist critique of “The expected value of extinction risk reduction is positive”
antimonyanthony
1y
10
53
What We Owe the Past
Austin
7mo
19
54
Why do you find the Repugnant Conclusion repugnant?
Will Bradshaw
1y
63
23
Transcript of a talk on The non-identity problem by Derek Parfit at EAGxOxford 2016
james
6mo
4
79
Shelly Kagan - readings for Ethics and the Future seminar (spring 2021)
james
1y
7
88
Avoiding the Repugnant Conclusion is not necessary for population ethics: new many-author collaboration.
deanspears
1y
16
85
Against neutrality about creating happy lives
Joe_Carlsmith
1y
38
9
A critique of strong longtermism
Pablo Rosado
3mo
11
11
Beware ethical systems without repugnant conclusions
Ezra Newman
4mo
2
47
Critical summary of Meacham’s "Person-Affecting Views and Saturating Counterpart Relations"
Ardenlk
1y
31
4
Population Ethics Meets Genetic Enhancement
Parrhesia
2mo
4
31
The Impossibility of a Satisfactory Population Prospect Axiology
EJT
1y
12
71
Confused about "making people happy" vs. "making happy people"
tobiasleenaert
5mo
46
12
Jane English on Rawls and duties to future generations
William D'Alessandro
1mo
3
12
The standard person-affecting view doesn't solve the Repugnant Conclusion.
RedStateBlueState
3mo
6
9
The problem of possible populations: animal farming, sustainability, extinction and the repugnant conclusion
Stijn
1y
9
-4
Will longtermists self-efface
Noah Scales
4mo
23