Go Back
Choose this branch
You can't go any further
meritocratic
regular
democratic
hot
top
alive
35 posts
Population ethics
Person-affecting views
5 posts
142
A longtermist critique of “The expected value of extinction risk reduction is positive”
antimonyanthony
1y
10
88
Avoiding the Repugnant Conclusion is not necessary for population ethics: new many-author collaboration.
deanspears
1y
16
85
Against neutrality about creating happy lives
Joe_Carlsmith
1y
38
79
Shelly Kagan - readings for Ethics and the Future seminar (spring 2021)
james
1y
7
57
Descriptive Population Ethics and Its Relevance for Cause Prioritization
David_Althaus
4y
9
54
Why do you find the Repugnant Conclusion repugnant?
Will Bradshaw
1y
63
53
What We Owe the Past
Austin
7mo
19
47
Critical summary of Meacham’s "Person-Affecting Views and Saturating Counterpart Relations"
Ardenlk
1y
31
47
Teruji Thomas, 'The Asymmetry, Uncertainty, and the Long Term'
Pablo
3y
6
46
Defending the Procreation Asymmetry with Conditional Interests
MichaelStJules
3y
13
42
Are You Sure You Want To Donate To The Against Malaria Foundation?
MichaelPlant
6y
48
37
The problem with person-affecting views
Jack Malde
2y
22
31
The Impossibility of a Satisfactory Population Prospect Axiology
EJT
1y
12
31
Conditional interests, asymmetries and EA priorities
MichaelStJules
3y
23
71
Confused about "making people happy" vs. "making happy people"
tobiasleenaert
5mo
46
12
Jane English on Rawls and duties to future generations
William D'Alessandro
1mo
3
12
The standard person-affecting view doesn't solve the Repugnant Conclusion.
RedStateBlueState
3mo
6
9
The problem of possible populations: animal farming, sustainability, extinction and the repugnant conclusion
Stijn
1y
9
-4
Will longtermists self-efface
Noah Scales
4mo
23