Go Back
Choose this branch
You can't go any further
meritocratic
regular
democratic
hot
top
alive
35 posts
Population ethics
Person-affecting views
5 posts
114
Avoiding the Repugnant Conclusion is not necessary for population ethics: new many-author collaboration.
deanspears
1y
16
106
A longtermist critique of “The expected value of extinction risk reduction is positive”
antimonyanthony
1y
10
91
Against neutrality about creating happy lives
Joe_Carlsmith
1y
38
91
Shelly Kagan - readings for Ethics and the Future seminar (spring 2021)
james
1y
7
58
Why do you find the Repugnant Conclusion repugnant?
Will Bradshaw
1y
63
56
What We Owe the Past
Austin
7mo
19
54
Descriptive Population Ethics and Its Relevance for Cause Prioritization
David_Althaus
4y
9
51
Critical summary of Meacham’s "Person-Affecting Views and Saturating Counterpart Relations"
Ardenlk
1y
31
43
Teruji Thomas, 'The Asymmetry, Uncertainty, and the Long Term'
Pablo
3y
6
40
Are You Sure You Want To Donate To The Against Malaria Foundation?
MichaelPlant
6y
48
39
The problem with person-affecting views
Jack Malde
2y
22
36
The Impossibility of a Satisfactory Population Prospect Axiology
EJT
1y
12
34
Defending the Procreation Asymmetry with Conditional Interests
MichaelStJules
3y
13
29
Transcript of a talk on The non-identity problem by Derek Parfit at EAGxOxford 2016
james
6mo
4
66
Confused about "making people happy" vs. "making happy people"
tobiasleenaert
5mo
46
16
The standard person-affecting view doesn't solve the Repugnant Conclusion.
RedStateBlueState
3mo
6
12
Jane English on Rawls and duties to future generations
William D'Alessandro
1mo
3
7
The problem of possible populations: animal farming, sustainability, extinction and the repugnant conclusion
Stijn
1y
9
-1
Will longtermists self-efface
Noah Scales
4mo
23